Issue - meetings

DC056357 - Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove

Meeting: 08/01/2015 - Planning & Highways Regulation Committee (Item 5)

5 DC056357 - Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove pdf icon PDF 4 MB

Approval of details in respect of layout, appearance, landscaping and scale of a residential development of 184 dwellings (approved under application reference DC046179).

 

The Committee is recommended to grant planning permission.

 

Officer contact: Chris Smyton on 0161 474 3657 or email: chris.smyton@stockport.gov.uk

Minutes:

In respect of plan no. 56357 for the approval of details in respect of layout, appearance, landscaping and scale of a residential development of 184 dwellings (approved under application reference DC046179) at Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove, it was

 

RESOLVED – That the Corporate Director for Place Management & Regeneration be authorised to determine the application subject to negotiation on suitably worded planning conditions.


Meeting: 09/12/2014 - Stepping Hill Area Committee (Item 5)

5 DC056357 - Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove pdf icon PDF 3 MB

Approval of details in respect of layout, appearance, landscaping and scale of a residential development of 184 dwellings (approved under application reference DC046179).

 

The Area Committee is invited to recommend that the Planning & Highways Regulation Committee grant planning permission.

Minutes:

In respect of plan no. 56357, for the approval of details in respect of layout, appearance, landscaping and scale of a residential development of 184 dwellings (approved under application reference DC046179) at Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove

 

a representative of the applicant spoke in support of the application.

 

It was then

 

RESOLVED - That the Planning & Highways Regulation Committee be informed of the Area Committee’s comments in respect of the application:-

 

·         The overall development would look attractive.

·         Assurances were sought and provided about the accessibility of the properties and the public spaces for those with physical disabilities.

·         Assurances were sought and provided in relation to access to local amenities and road widths having been addressed through amended plans.

·         Concerns were expressed that the separation between properties and garden sizes were below the preferred standard.