Venue: Committee Room 2, Town Hall, Stockport. View directions
Contact: Charles Yankiah (0161 474 3206)
No. | Item | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To approve as a correct record and sign the Minutes of the meeting held on 1 March 2023. Additional documents: Minutes: The Minutes (copies of which had been circulated) of the meeting held on 01 March 2023 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|||||||
Declarations of Interest Councillors and officers to declare any interests which they have in any of the items on the agenda for the meeting. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillors and officers were invited to declare any interest which they had in any of the items on the agenda for the meeting.
The following interest was declared:-
|
|||||||
Call-In To consider call-in items (if any). Additional documents: Minutes: There were no call-in items to consider. |
|||||||
To consider a report of the Corporate Director of People and Integration.
The report provides details relating to the 2022/23 Portfolio Performance and Resource Agreement (PPRA), which was considered by the committee on 7 September and approved by Cabinet on 28 September 2022. It also provides a comprehensive summary of progress against portfolio priorities, performance indicators and budgets during 2022/23, but with a specific focus on the fourth quarter (January to March 2023).
The Scrutiny Committee is asked to:
a) Consider the Annual Portfolio Performance and Resource Report.
b) Review the progress against delivering key projects, priority outcomes, targets and budgets for 2022/23.
c) Highlight key areas of and responsibility for taking forward corrective action to address any performance or resource issues.
d) Highlight any significant issues or changes to be fed back to the Cabinet alongside the Corporate Performance and Resource Report.
e) Identify how areas of strong performance and good practice can be shared in other services.
Officer contacts: Gaynor Ward, Strategy and Performance Manager gaynor.ward@stockport.gov.uk (0161 474 3186)
Gill Dixon, CSS Manager (Specialist) Finance – Children’s Social Care gill.dixon@stockport.gov.uk (0161 474 3886)
Peter Hughes, CSS Manager (Specialist) Finance – Education & Schools peter.hughes@stockport.gov.uk (0161 474 3947) Additional documents: Minutes: A representative of the Corporate Director of People and Integration submitted a report (copies of which had been circulated) providing details relating to the 2022/23 Portfolio Performance and Resource Agreement (PPRA), which was considered by the committee on 7 September and approved by Cabinet on 28 September 2022 and also provides a comprehensive summary of progress against portfolio priorities, performance indicators and budgets during 2022/23, but with a specific focus on the fourth quarter (January to March 2023).
The Cabinet Member for Children, Families and Education (Councillor Wendy Meikle) attended the meeting to respond to questions from the Scrutiny Committee.
The following comments were made/issues raised:-
Portfolio Introduction
· Clarification was sought regarding the proposed new Lisbon School build and the family hub. In response, it was stated that it was planned to be opened in the next academic year following the building being burnt to such an extent that it required considerable building work. · Members enquired about the ‘business case’ relating to the 3-bed and 5-bed children homes to increase local sufficiency. It was stated that two sites had been identified and the re-acquisition of the properties was being progressed accordingly.
Priority 1 - All babies and children are given the very best start in life by their parents and carers and start school ready to learn
· Members welcomed the detail in the report and recognised how useful the information was for the Committee. · Clarification was sought regarding what the ‘transition conversations’ were. It was noted that it related to the teams around the early years settings and the discussions that would take place to support transition between the settings. · It was noted that regarding the ‘Start Well Sessions’ that 196 families were booked onto sessions, however, only 111 families attended. It was stated that the sessions were universal and were up to parents to access the sessions with no limits for attendance. · Members enquired about what was being done to promote and advertise the ‘Healthy Start Scheme’ and what was the uptake. In response, it was stated that the teams were proactively promoting the scheme through midwifery, health visitors and was a targeted approach. It was noted that the details of the uptake were not available, but would be shared with the Committee following the meeting.
Priority 3 - All children, young people and families have access to an effective integrated early help offer
· Clarification was sought regarding the context relating to the ‘decline of converting the Early Help Assessments and plans of support. In response, it was stated that it could vary from no longer needing an assessment or following discussions with family no longer want to take it forward, but was constantly being reviewed and monitored.
Priority 4 - Children and families with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) receive the best possible support at the right time to ensure that the best possible outcomes are achieved
· Members enquired about ‘CFE63, EHCP issued on time’ and why had it been decreased. In response, it was stated that not only had there been a decrease but the demand had been increased since Covid. It was also noted that there were challenges with recruiting educational psychologists nationally, which then had a knock-on effect with completing assessments. · It was noted that there was about a 37% increase in demand relating to EHCPs and that there were about 437 EHCPs yet to be finalised. · Clarification was sought regarding a breakdown between the traditional EHCPs and those that related to mental health. It was noted that the greatest demand was ‘autism’ and ‘neuro-diversity’ mainly, but the greatest demand was around emotional, social and mental health concerns.
Priority 5 - All children and young people live safely and happily within their families, there are fewer family breakdowns, and rates of crime and anti-social behaviour reduce
· Members enquired about the ‘remand grant overspend’. It was noted that the grant for 2022/23 was £36k from ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|||||||
Portfolio Performance and Resources - Draft 2023/24 Agreement PDF 116 KB To consider a report of the Corporate Director of People and Integration.
The report provides details relating to the draft 2023/24 Agreement for the Children, Families and Education Portfolio for consideration and comment by the Committee.
The Scrutiny Committee is asked to review and comment on the draft Portfolio Agreement.
Officer contact: Gaynor Ward, Strategy and Performance Manager gaynor.ward@stockport.gov.uk (0161 474 3186)
Gill Dixon, CSS Manager (Specialist) Finance – Children’s Social Care gill.dixon@stockport.gov.uk (0161 474 3886)
Peter Hughes, CSS Manager (Specialist) Finance – Education & Schools peter.hughes@stockport.gov.uk (0161 474 3947)
Additional documents: Minutes: A representative of the Corporate Director of People and Integration submitted a report (copies of which had been circulated) providing details relating to the draft 2023/24 Agreement for the Children, Families and Education Portfolio.
The Cabinet Member for Children, Families and Education (Councillor Wendy Meikle) attended the meeting to respond to questions from the Scrutiny Committee.
The following comments were made/issues raised:-
Priority 2 - All children and young people are well prepared for adulthood and engage in education, employment, and training
· Clarification was sought regarding the accuracy of the CFE25 and CFE28 figures which was impressive. It was noted that it was the statutory responsibility of the authority to track 16-18 year olds, through information from colleges, training providers and apprenticeships. Where the information was not available then the team would go out and seek the information from the young people and their families. · Members enquired about how Stockport could work with providers across Greater Manchester to improve the offer and provisions. It was noted that this was already being progressed through developing and implementing a post-16 plan with colleagues across Greater Manchester. · It was noted that the delivery plan would be within this municipal year and before March 2024. · Members requested that regarding the outputs of 16-18 year olds and the vagueness of the data, that an additional PI be included relating to the ‘destination data of the 18 year olds and their further education’.
REOSLVED – (1) That the report be noted.
(2) That consideration be given to including an additional PI in future reports relating to the ‘destination data of the 18 year olds and their further education’. |
|||||||
Scrutiny Review Topic Selection To seek suggestions for Scrutiny Review topics for inclusion in the 2023/2024 scrutiny work programme Additional documents: Minutes: A representative of the Assistant Director – Legal & Democratic Governance submitted a report (copies of which had been circulated) setting out a suggested process for the selection of scrutiny review topics and an explanation as to how the reviews would be supported.
The Committee was invited to choose a topic for their next review.
Members proposed the following the topics-
· SEMH & EHCP referrals · Skills and Technical Education – mapping routes, post-16 plan · Services for Young People – including youth services
It was noted that Skills and Technical Education would be included in the Post-16 Plan that would be submitted to the Committee at a future meeting.
RESOLVED – (1) That the members of the Scrutiny Committee be invited to submit their preference for the next review to the Democratic Services Officer following a scoping meeting, as soon as practicable from either (1) SEMH & EHCP Referrals or (2) Services for Young People.
(2) That following the submission of suggestions authority be delegated to the Assistant Director – Legal & Democratic Governance, in consultation with the Chair, to recommend to Council the next scrutiny review and to appoint members to the Panel as necessary. |
|||||||
To consider a report of the Assistant Director – Legal & Democratic Governance and Monitoring Officer (Legal & Democratic Governance).
The report sets out planned agenda items for the Scrutiny Committee’s next meeting and Forward Plan items that fall within the remit of the Scrutiny Committee.
The Scrutiny Committee is invited to consider the information in the report and put forward any agenda items for future meetings of the Committee.
Officer contact: Charles Yankiah on 0161 474 3206 or email: Additional documents: Minutes: A representative of the Assistant Director - Legal & Democratic Governance submitted a report (copies of which had been circulated) setting out the planned agenda items for the Scrutiny Committee’s next meeting and any relevant Forward Plan items.
RESOLVED – (1) That the report be noted.
(2) That the Assistant Director - Legal & Democratic Governance be requested to make arrangements for the following items to be programmed onto the agenda for future meetings of the Scrutiny Committee:-
· Alternative Provisions for KS4 – secondary phase (private/providers/external providers/growth in EHCP, progress into Post-16 educational training) · Post-16 Plan · Virtual School Update · Maintained Nursery Schools within the Borough · Persistent absenteeism and actual missing children |