6 DC058317 - Rear of 41 Compstall Road, Romiley PDF 123 KB
Change of use from storage in retail space to light vehicle repairs (retrospective).
The Committee is recommended to refuse planning permission.
Officer contact: Mark Burgess on 474 3659 or email: mark.burgess@stockport.gov.uk
Additional documents:
Minutes:
In respect of plan no. DC058317 for the change of use from storage in retail space to light vehicle repairs (retrospective) at the rear of 41 Compstall Road, Romiley, it was
MOVED AND SECONDED – That planning permission be granted.
For the motion 2, against 10.
MOTION NOT CARRIED
FURTHER MOTION MOVED AND SECONDED – That planning permission be refused on the grounds that the development would result in the loss of residential amenity through noise and disturbance and by virtue of the failure of the development to benefit from suitable parking and servicing facilities.
For the motion 10, against 2.
It was then
RESOLVED – (10 for, 2 against) That planning permission be refused on the grounds that the development would result in the loss of residential amenity through noise and disturbance and by virtue of a failure of the development to benefit from suitable parking and servicing facilities.
5 DC058318 : Rear of 41 Compstall Road, Romiley, Stockport, SK6 4BT PDF 40 KB
Change of use from storage in retail space to light vehicle repairs (retrospective).
The Area Committee is recommended to refuse planning permission.
Officer contact: Mark Burgess on 474 3659 or email: mark.burgess@stockport.gov.uk
Additional documents:
Minutes:
In respect of plan no. 58318 for the change of use from storage in retail space to light vehicle repairs (retrospective) on land to the rear of 41 Compstall Road, Romiley, Stockport,
a member of the public spoke against the application; and
the applicant spoke in support of the application.
MOVED AND SECONDED – That planning permission be refused on the grounds that the development would result in a loss of residential amenity and failure to benefit from suitable parking and servicing facilities.
For the motion 1, against 4.
MOTION NOT CARRIED
It was then
RESOLVED – That the Planning & Highways Regulation Committee be recommended to undertake a site visit in view of the Area Committee’s concerns over the impact of the proposed development on residential amenity.