Issue - meetings

DC056359 - Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove

Meeting: 08/01/2015 - Planning & Highways Regulation Committee (Item 5)

5 DC056359 - Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove pdf icon PDF 441 KB

Reserved matters approval for access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale of 42 dwellings approved under planning application reference DC051671.

 

The Committee is recommended to grant planning permission.

 

Officer contact: Chris Smyton on 0161 474 3657 or email: chris.smyton@stockport.gov.uk

Minutes:

In respect of plan no. 56359 for reserved matters approval for access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale of 42 dwellings approved under planning application reference DC051671 at Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove, it was

 

RESOLVED – That the Corporate Director for Place Management & Regeneration be authorised to determine the application subject to negotiation on suitably worded planning conditions.

 


Meeting: 09/12/2014 - Stepping Hill Area Committee (Item 5)

5 DC056359 - Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove pdf icon PDF 319 KB

Reserved matters approval for access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale of 42 dwellings approved under planning application reference DC051671.

 

The Area Committee is invited to recommend that the Planning & Highways Regulation Committee grant planning permission.

Minutes:

In respect of plan no. 56359 for reserved matters approval for access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale of 42 dwellings approved under planning application reference DC051671 at Unit 1, Mirrlees Drive, Hazel Grove, it was

 

RESOLVED - That the Planning & Highways Regulation Committee be informed of the Area Committee’s comments in respect of the application:-

 

·         The overall development would look attractive.

·         Assurances were sought and provided about the accessibility of the properties and the public spaces for those with physical disabilities.

·         Assurances were sought and provided in relation to access to local amenities and road widths having been addressed through amended plans.

·         Concerns were expressed that the separation between properties and garden sizes were below the preferred standard.