Issue - meetings

Objection Report - Moving Traffic Regulation Order, 20mph Speed Limit on Woodford Garden Village, Woodford

Meeting: 03/08/2023 - Bramhall & Cheadle Hulme South Area Committee (Item 11)

11 Objection Report - Moving Traffic Regulation Order, 20mph Speed Limit on Woodford Garden Village, Woodford pdf icon PDF 494 KB

To consider a joint report of the Director for Place Management and the Assistant

Director - Legal & Democratic Governance.

 

The report details the objections made in relation to the proposed Moving Traffic Regulation Order - 20mph Speed Limit on Woodford Garden Village, Woodford.

 

The Area Committee is recommended to make the order as advertised.

 

Officer Contact: Zoe Allan by email: zoe.allan@stockport.gov.uk

Additional documents:

Minutes:

A representative of the Assistant Director – Legal & Democratic Governance submitted a joint report on behalf of the Director of Place Management and Assistant Director – Legal & Democratic Governance (copies of which had been circulated) which detailed the objections made in relation to the proposed Moving Traffic Regulation Order - 20mph Speed Limit on Woodford Garden Village, Woodford.

 

The following comments were made/ issues raised:-

 

·         It was noted that there had been a public question regarding Shackleton Road, which would be covered by the Moving Traffic Regulation Order.

·         Clarification was requested in relation to the speed limit proposals for the whole of Woodford Garden Village. 

·         It was commented that Stockport Council could not approve a 10mph limit as requested in objections and public questions, as a 10mph speed limit would require consent from the Secretary of State.

·         Members requested that Redrow be asked to consider signage highlighting children playing on the roads in proximity to the nearby park.

 

RESOLVED – That, having considered a number of objections to the proposed Moving Traffic Regulation Order - 20mph Speed Limit on Woodford Garden Village, Woodford, the Area Committee agreed that notwithstanding the objections, the order be made as advertised.