Venue: Committee Room 3 - Town Hall
Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Minutes PDF 32 KB
To approve as a
correct record and sign the Minutes of the meeting held on 1
December 2011.
Minutes:
The Minutes (copies of
which had been circulated) of the meeting held on 1 December 2011
were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair.
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest
Councillors and officers to declare any interests which
they have in any of the items on the agenda for the
meeting.
Minutes:
No declarations of
interest were made.
|
3. |
Children's Centres - Background Information PDF 37 KB
To consider a
background information report of the Head of Integrated Prevention
Services on ‘Children’s Centre Services’.
The
report provides background
information about the Children’s Centre Core Purpose and the
statutory basis for Children’s Centres.
The Panel is requested to consider the information
presented in the report and raise any issues that may form part of
the Scrutiny Review.
Contact Officer: Mike
Hughes Tel: 0161 474 5753 email: mike.hughes@stockport.gov.uk
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of Integrated Prevention Services and
the Assistant Head of Integrated Prevention Services submitted a
report on behalf of the Service Director (Children’s
Safeguarding & Prevention) (copies of which had been
circulated) providing background information on the
Children’s Centre Core Purpose, the statutory basis for
Children’s Centres and the Healthy Child Programme.
The following key issues were
highlighted:-
- In October 2010, the
Sure Start Children’s Centres Statutory Guidance set out a
statutory duty on local authorities to ensure sufficient provision
of Sure Start Children’s Centres (as defined in The
Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009) to meet
local need.
- The Government had
introduced an updated Core Purpose, which had a focus on improving
outcomes for young children and their families, in particular for
the most disadvantaged families in order to give children under 5
years of age the best possible start. Universal services would be
retained where possible but there would be a sharper focus on
assessing multiple risk factors and helping the families most in
need.
- The Core Purpose had
three focus areas: (1) child development and school readiness; (2)
parenting aspirations, self-esteem and parenting skills; and (3)
child, family health and life chances.
- Based on previous
requirements to have each centre serving approximately 800 children
under 5 years of age in each community,
Stockport currently had 19 Children’s Centres.
- The new proposals
would mean retaining 12 hubs delivering the full Core Purpose as
Sure Start Children’s Centres. 7 centres would become
satellites. These would no longer be Sure Start Children’s
Centres and would not deliver the full Core Purpose, however they
would retain the Early Help Service.
- The 12 hubs would
cover Stockport’s Priority Areas. The four Priority 1 Areas
combined with the nine Priority 2 Areas had the top 20% of the most
deprived families in the borough. The new proposals would allow a
redistribution of financial resources from other areas in the
borough to allow for a greater focus on these Priority Areas.
- The 7 satellites
would not cover any Priority Areas. The streamlining of management
responsibilities in these centres would mean a reduction in
reporting requirements to Ofsted, data analysis and the delivery of
the full Core Purpose. There would be a reduction in management
capacity from 12 to 9 equivalent full-time staff.
- There would be an
introduction of a charging policy for certain non-statutory
services at each satellite. Despite having pockets of deprivation,
there is likely to be more ability to pay for additional, optional
services in these areas. The services in the 12 hubs would remain
free of charge.
- The services
delivered in each hub and satellite would be tailored to meet the
needs of the community they serve.
A representative of the Director of
Public Health submitted a report (copies of which had been
circulated) setting out a summary of health perspectives on the
Streamlining Family Support Programme.
The following key issues were
highlighted:-
|
4. |
Proposals for Children's Centres PDF 42 KB
To consider a report
of the Head of Integrated Prevention Services outlining the
‘Proposals for Children’s Centres’.
The report provides a summary of the methodology used
for the formal consultation on the proposals regarding
Children’s Centres. It provides the context for the
management proposals in relation to future delivery of
Children’s Centres and also the plans for access to
Children’s Centre services and service delivery.
The Panel is requested to consider (i) the
information presented in the report; (ii) the proposals for management and service delivery across
the Hubs and Satellites; and (iii) the targeting and prioritisation
of the Children’s Centre service.
Contact Officer: Mike
Hughes Tel: 0161 474 5753 email: mike.hughes@stockport.gov.uk
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of Integrated Prevention
Services and the Assistant Head of Integrated Prevention Services
submitted a report on behalf of the Service Director
(Children’s Safeguarding & Prevention) (copies of which
had been circulated) outlining the methodology used for the formal
consultation on the proposals regarding Children’s
Centres.
The following key issues were
highlighted:-
- The management
proposals in relation to the Children’s Centres were the
subject of an extensive consultation between September and December
2011. The geographical reorganisation of the centres had been
aligned with the work of the Neighbourhood Management Boards and
the health visiting teams.
- Currently, there were
19 centres with 12 equivalent full time leaders. Under the new
proposals there would be 9 equivalent full time leaders of the 12
hubs who would have management oversight of the 7 satellites.
- The local authority
had a responsibility to publicise the services at each
Children’s Centre to ensure that families are informed about
where and when to attend the centres.
- The management
reorganisation would retain a Family Worker post at each satellite,
created to deliver any needed learning and development activities
for vulnerable families who were unable to pay for those
services.
- Data analysis allowed
the services available at each centre to be tailored to the needs
of each area to ensure that families were receiving the most
appropriate services to their needs.
- Each hub had a
responsibility to prioritise the families that live within their
reach area. If there was capacity for a particular service,
families from a different area could still attend, however the hub
would need to prioritise local families in need. This was
particularly important in Priority Areas.
- A workshop would take
place on Thursday 12 January 2012 with Children’s Centre
leaders across the borough to discuss the new management
proposals.
The following issues were discussed/comments
made:-
- It was noted with
concern that the new management structure model of the hubs and
satellites was not in alignment with Ward and Area Committee
allocations. Officers explained that there were clear reporting
lines in place from each Children’s Centre to both
Neighbourhood Management Boards and Area Committees and that it was
important to note that the management model set out in Appendix B
would not affect the delivery of services to families and only
related to the administration of the centres.
- In creating the new
management structure, data including the numbers of children under
5 years of age and the needs of each community had been taken into
consideration.
- The importance of
each Neighbourhood Policing Team being made aware of the
geographical reach and management structure of each hub and
satellite.
- There was already
successful integration of work between health visitors and midwives
in Children’s Centres that ensured families in need were
targeted.
- It was important to
monitor any contracts in place with entities providing fee-paying
services at each satellite centre in order to keep the costs of any
service low.
- The need to ensure
that any vulnerable families living in satellite areas who may not
be able to ...
view the full minutes text for item 4.
|
5. |
Streamlining Family Support Services - Project Plan PDF 55 KB
To consider a report of the Head of
Integrated Prevention Services.
The
report sets out the draft project plan for the Scrutiny Review
– Streamlining Family Support Services.
Contact Officer: David
Tomlinson Tel: 0161 218 1634 email: david.tomlinson@stockport.gov.uk
Minutes:
The Head of Integrated Prevention Services
submitted a report on behalf of the Service Director
(Children’s Safeguarding & Prevention) (copies of which
had been circulated) containing the draft project plan for the
future meetings of the Panel.
The following issues were discussed/comments
made:-
- The proposed site
visit to the Contact Centre would take place between Wednesday 8
February and Tuesday 6 March 2012. There would be no more than 3
Councillors at each visit. It was requested that anonymous case
studies be circulated prior to the visit.
- Ann McGrath should be
invited to the Scrutiny Review Panel meeting on Wednesday 7 March
2012 and there should also be representation from the Youth
Offending Service and the voluntary sector.
RESOLVED – That the report be noted and an update presented at the next
meeting.
|
6. |
Dates of Future Meetings
Minutes:
RESOLVED - That future
meetings of the Scrutiny Review Panel – Streamlining
Family Support Services be held on the following dates at
5.30pm:-
Tuesday 7 February 2012
Wednesday 7 March 2012
|