Issue - meetings

Corporate Performance and Resources - Third Update Reports 2018/19

Meeting: 26/02/2019 - Corporate, Resource Management & Governance Scrutiny Committee (Item 5)

5 Corporate Performance and Resources - Third Update Reports 2018/19 pdf icon PDF 101 KB

To consider a report of the Deputy Chief Executive.

 

This item covers two reports as follows:

 

·           Third Update Corporate Performance and Resources Report (CPRR) 2018/19

·           Third Update Leader’s Report 2018/19

 

The Third Update Corporate Performance and Resource Report (CPRR) provides an update on progress in delivering the Council’s Priority Outcomes and budget since the mid year report 2018/19, with a particular emphasis on the third quarter (October to December). It is based on the 2018/19 Council Plan and Budget, and also reflects Cabinet priorities set out Portfolio Agreements.

 

Updates are included on delivery of policy priorities, alongside Reform Projects. The report also includes forecasts of budget and performance data where this is available, along with an update on the Corporate Risk Register. It is supported by seven Portfolio Performance and Resource Reports which were considered by the most recent Scrutiny cycle.

 

The Leader’s Report reflects on significant achievements and challenges, key decisions at Greater Manchester level, along with areas of progress in delivering council priorities over the first half of the year.

 

These reports were considered and approved by Cabinet on 5 February 2019. 

 

Scrutiny Committee is asked to:

·           Consider the Third Update Reports;  

·           Review the progress against delivering corporate objectives, key projects, priority outcomes, targets and budgets for 2018/19;

·           Highlight key areas for taking forward corrective action to address any performance or resource issues;

·           Identify how areas of strong performance and good practice can be shared in other services.

 

Officer contact: Peter Owston / Jonathan Davies, 0161 474 3274 / 218 1025, peter.owston@stockport.gov.uk / jonathan.davies@stockport.gov.uk

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Reform & Governance submitted the third Corporate Performance and Resources Report (CPRR) for 2018/19 and third Leader’s Update Report 2018/19 (copies of which had been circulated) that covered the period up to December 2018 with particular emphasis on the third quarter (October to December).

 

Updates were included on delivery of policy priorities, alongside Reform Projects. The report also included early forecasts of budget and performance data where this was available, along with an update on the refreshed Corporate Risk Register. It was supported by seven Portfolio Performance and Resource Reports that had been considered by scrutiny committees in the January Scrutiny cycle.

 

The Leader’s Annual Report reflected on significant achievements and challenges, key decisions at Greater Manchester level, along with areas of progress in delivering Council priorities over the first half of 2018/19.

 

The following comments were made/ issues raised:

 

·         Clarification was sought whether there were any financial implications in relation to off-target performance against littering on highway. In response it was confirmed that there were no proposals to make reductions in public realm spend in the next year, but a review was planned. It was acknowledged that there was a debate about how investment was made in such services. In setting a budget the assumptions were based on existing service specifications, and performance targets were also based on previous years. The Chair commented that it was important for the Scrutiny Committee to have oversight of how investment in services related to performance.

·         Further information was sought on how the Council assessed the job creation implications of the lettings in its property portfolio. In response it was stated that the Council had significant floor space within its portfolio, and the lettings policy was primarily assessed against its commercial viability. The Council was also working to ensure the infrastructure was in place to support existing and new businesses seeking to expand and develop.

·         Concerns were expressed about the methodology used to evaluate performance that lead to off target performance leading to an assessment as ‘green’. In response it was acknowledged that this could lead to confusion but this may be reflective of a number of factors including a range of tolerance or performance being on target for the quarter and projected to meet target by year end although short of target for the reporting period.

·         What were the implications of the roll-out of Universal Credit (UC) on Council Tax income? In response it was stated that the Council had worked hard to ensure IT systems had been integrated to ensure that fluctuations in a person’s UC income were factored into Council Tax systems to reduce the likelihood of problems for claimants. It was further commented that there had been a slow transition process so there were not currently large numbers of residents receiving UC. The Council also had an officer based at the Job Centre to provide support and who would encourage claimants to take up for Council Tax Support. It was confirmed that there had been any significant problems encountered as of yet. Committee members thanked officers for their hard work in preparing for these changes and minimising the disruption for residents.

·         What were the implication of recent national retail chain closures in the Town Centre on business rates income? In response it was stated that business rates collection was volatile and could be impacted by factors outside of the Council’s control. Nevertheless the picture in Stockport remained encouraging.

·         The Council had achieved improvements in both Council Tax and Business Rate collection rates that reflected the fact the Council was a good collector but also that residents and businesses were good payers. Recently agreed changes to the Council Tax Discount Scheme may impact on collection rates although there may be an increase in the total in the fund.

·         Concern was expressed about whether the proposals in the draft GMSF to give priority to brownfield sites would lead  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5


Meeting: 05/02/2019 - Cabinet (Item 6)

6 Corporate Performance and Resources - Third Update Reports 2018/19 pdf icon PDF 86 KB

To consider a report of the Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Policy, Finance & Devolution.

 

The Third Update Corporate Performance and Resource Report (CPRR) provides an update on progress in delivering the Council’s priority outcomes and budget during the third quarter of the year (October to December).

 

As previously agreed with Cabinet and Scrutiny Chairs, the CPRR is presented in a ‘lighter touch’ format, focusing on highlights and exceptions since the mid-year report. It includes hyperlinks to the seven Portfolio Reports recently considered by Scrutiny Committees. References are also included to related information such as updates on the Corporate Risk Register and Greater Manchester Strategy which have been published elsewhere.

 

The Leader’s Third Update Report reflects on achievements, key issues, events and changes since the Mid-Year Report, including key activity at GM level. 

 

Cabinet is asked to:

 

·         Review progress against delivering Council priorities and capital schemes alongside budget and performance forecasts contained within the report;

·         Note and comment on the new format of the report;

·         Approve the virements to the Revenue Budget set out in 2.2.3;

·         Note the cash limit and non-cash limit forecast positions for 2018/19 as set out in 2.3.1;

·         Note the Dedicated Schools Grant and Housing Revenue Account forecast positions as set out in 2.4 and 2.5;

·         Note the position on reserves and balances as set out in Appendix 4;

·         Note the forecast position for the Collection Fund as set out in 2.6;

·         Note the forecast position for the 2018/19 Capital Programme as set out in 3.1;

·         Note the re-phasing of capital schemes during the quarter as set out in 3.3;

·         Approve the proposals for resourcing and additional resources required for the Capital Programme as set out in 3.5;

·         Approve the 2018/19 Capital prudential indicators and resourcing requirements as set out in 3.6 and 3.7;

·         Note the Treasury Management review and activity in Q3 as set out in section 4; and

·         Identify key areas for further investigation and responsibility for taking forward corrective action to address any existing or forecast issues or risks.

 

Officer contact: Peter Owston / Jonathan Davies, 0161 474 3274 / 218 1025,

peter.owston@stockport.gov.uk /  jonathan.davies@stockport.gov.uk

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Policy, Finance & Devolution submitted a report (copies of which had been circulated) providing the Cabinet with an update on the delivery of the Council’s Priority Outcomes and budget since the mid-year update, with particular focus on the third quarter of 2018/19 (October to December).

 

The Leader’s third update report was also submitted, reflecting on achievements, key issues, events and activity at a Greater Manchester level.

 

The Leader highlighted the following issues:-

 

·           Progress was improving in achieving performance targets.

·           The finalised Local Government Financial Settlement was in line with the provisional settlement and while one-off funding was welcomed, it was not sufficient to provide sustainable relief for the pressure on children and adult services.

·           The Government announcement halting the roll-out of Universal Credit was welcomed.

·           AGMA and the GMCA had recently begun the next phase of consultation on the revised Greater Manchester Spatial Framework that included a reduced housing requirement, had less impact on the greenbelt and proposed increased building on brownfield sites. Public engagement had been significant during the first phase of consultation and it was hoped the public would continue to engage.

·           The Government had given the GM Mayor the ability to increase the police precept up to £24. Plans were being developed to identify how the resources could be utilised most effectively.

·           The Armistice Commemorations that had taken place in the run up and on 11 November 2018 had been very successful, and all those involved were commended for their efforts.

 

Cabinet Members were invited to highlight any specific issues within their portfolios.

 

The Cabinet Member for Economy & Regeneration reiterated earlier comments about the success of Armistice Commemorations and highlighted the lasting impact of this work in developing partnerships with a range of cultural organisations.

 

The Cabinet Member for Children & Families reported on a Greater Manchester project to assess the sufficiency of care and foster care placements in the conurbation to accommodate demand from the ten local authorities given the increased demands locally and from local authorities outside of GM placing children within the area.

 

RESOLVED – That in relation to the Corporate Performance and Resources Report for the third quarter of 2018/19:

 

·         progress against delivering Council priorities and capital schemes, budget and performance forecasts contained within the report be noted;

·         the virements to the Revenue Budget set out in 2.2.3 of the report be approved;

·         Note the cash limit and non-cash limit forecast positions for 2018/19 as set out in 2.3.1 of the report be noted;

·         the Dedicated Schools Grant and Housing Revenue Account forecast positions as set out in 2.4 and 2.5 of the report be noted;

·         the position on reserves and balances as set out in Appendix 4 of the report be noted;

·         the forecast position for the Collection Fund as set out in 2.6 of the report be noted;

·         the forecast position for the 2018/19 Capital Programme as set out in 3.1 of the report be noted;

·         the re-phasing of capital schemes during the quarter as set out in 3.3 of the report be noted;

·         the proposals for resourcing and additional resources required for the Capital Programme as set out in 3.5 of the report be approved;

·         the 2018/19 Capital prudential indicators and resourcing requirements as set out in 3.6 and 3.7 of the report be approved; and

·         the Treasury Management review and activity in Q3 as set out in section 4 of the report be noted.